TY - JOUR
T1 - What is investigative interviewing (and what is it not)? A primer on the ethos of suspect interviewing
AU - May, Lennart
AU - Fahsing, Ivar
AU - Kelly, Christopher E.
AU - Barela, Steven
AU - Milne, Rebecca
AU - Bull, Ray
N1 - No embargo - Emerald
PY - 2025/4/3
Y1 - 2025/4/3
N2 - Purpose: The questioning of suspects is central to many police investigations, and interviewing techniques have developed over time. In particular, investigative interviewing – which is a research-based and practically proven approach to gathering reliable and relevant information – is gaining ground worldwide. As a result, it is expected to be increasingly included in guidelines, training and police/legal practices around the globe. However, misconceptions and inaccuracies in defining and interpreting investigative interviewing’s practical, psychological and legal foundations can result in misunderstandings and serious consequences such as false decisions and miscarriages of justice. Therefore, this paper aims to decribe the underlying elements of investigative interviewing to offer guidance for policymakers, law enforcement decision makers, researchers and trainers. Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws on existing research, as well as practical experience from interviewing, teaching, and advising, to examine what investigative interviewing is. Findings: At the core of investigative interviewing are three pillars: (1) actively open-minded thinking, (2) research-based tactics and techniques and (3) a legal and humane approach. Practical implications: Based on this, the present study discusses the boundaries of investigative interviewing and the chances of introducing it into training, implementing it in practice and conducting further research on effective practice. Originality/value: The authors confirm that they have not submitted the manuscript elsewhere and have written it ourselves.
AB - Purpose: The questioning of suspects is central to many police investigations, and interviewing techniques have developed over time. In particular, investigative interviewing – which is a research-based and practically proven approach to gathering reliable and relevant information – is gaining ground worldwide. As a result, it is expected to be increasingly included in guidelines, training and police/legal practices around the globe. However, misconceptions and inaccuracies in defining and interpreting investigative interviewing’s practical, psychological and legal foundations can result in misunderstandings and serious consequences such as false decisions and miscarriages of justice. Therefore, this paper aims to decribe the underlying elements of investigative interviewing to offer guidance for policymakers, law enforcement decision makers, researchers and trainers. Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws on existing research, as well as practical experience from interviewing, teaching, and advising, to examine what investigative interviewing is. Findings: At the core of investigative interviewing are three pillars: (1) actively open-minded thinking, (2) research-based tactics and techniques and (3) a legal and humane approach. Practical implications: Based on this, the present study discusses the boundaries of investigative interviewing and the chances of introducing it into training, implementing it in practice and conducting further research on effective practice. Originality/value: The authors confirm that they have not submitted the manuscript elsewhere and have written it ourselves.
KW - Actively open-minded thinking
KW - Effective interviewing
KW - Investigative decision-making
KW - Investigative interviewing
KW - Méndez principles
KW - Suspect interview
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001830220&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/JCP-10-2024-0092
DO - 10.1108/JCP-10-2024-0092
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001830220
SN - 2009-3829
JO - Journal of Criminal Psychology
JF - Journal of Criminal Psychology
ER -