RIBA Submission PAS 91: response paper to the review of PAS 91

Walter Menteth; Peter Caplehorn

RIBA Submission PAS 91: response paper to the review of PAS 91

Walter Menteth, Peter Caplehorn

Research output: Working paper

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The RIBA welcomes the early review of PAS 91,the high aspirations that were set at the launch and within the document have not be achieved in practice. The desired alignment, universal use and subsequent reduction in needless bureaucracy, has seen little change since its introduction. Indeed from many perspectives these have all got worse since PAS 91’s introduction.
In this submission we cover -
 The current document.
 Use of the document and the current procurement landscape.
 The overall packaging of the PAS and how it fits with the procurement world.

Original language	English
Place of Publication	London
Publisher	RIBA
Number of pages	9
Publication status	Published - 21 Oct 2011
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

PAS 91
RIBA
qualification questionnaire
procurement
competition

Access to Document

https://www.architecture.com/

3 Paper
2 Article
1 Book
1 Commissioned report
More
- 1 Other chapter contribution

Competition Culture in Europe: Voices
Menteth, W. (Editor), 26 May 2018, London: Project Compass CIC. 156 p.
Research output: Book/Report › Book

Open Access
File
Save time on tendering for public projects
Menteth, W. & Morris, N., 25 Jan 2018, RIBA Members Newsletter & Website, January 25, 2018 7 p.
Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

Open Access
Procurement cheer for small firms
Menteth, W., 9 Sept 2014, In: RIBA Journal . p. 39-43
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
EU procurement directive: emerging public sector procurement
Menteth, W., Nov 2013. 42 p.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Open Access
Research in commercial practice: procurement
Menteth, W., 4 Oct 2013. 28 p.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Open Access
File

2 Membership of committee or panel
1 Consultancy

Client conversations: Insights into successful project outcomes
Menteth, W. (Advisor)
Jun 2013
Activity: Consultancy types › Consultancy
Cabinet Office (External organisation)
Menteth, W. (Member)
2011 → 2015
Activity: Membership types › Membership of committee or panel
Royal Institute of British Architects (External organisation)
Menteth, W. (Member)
2011 → 2013
Activity: Membership types › Membership of committee or panel

RIBA London Region councillor
Menteth, W. (Recipient), Aug 2011
Prize: Appointment
RIBA Research Trust Award
Menteth, W. (Recipient), 11 Jul 2012
Prize: Prize (including medals and awards)

File

Cite this

@techreport{9377687a9dfd4dbfa3f640061cf09019,

title = "RIBA Submission PAS 91: response paper to the review of PAS 91",

abstract = "The RIBA welcomes the early review of PAS 91,the high aspirations that were set at the launch and within the document have not be achieved in practice. The desired alignment, universal use and subsequent reduction in needless bureaucracy, has seen little change since its introduction. Indeed from many perspectives these have all got worse since PAS 91{\textquoteright}s introduction.In this submission we cover - The current document. Use of the document and the current procurement landscape. The overall packaging of the PAS and how it fits with the procurement world.",

keywords = "PAS 91, RIBA, qualification questionnaire, procurement, competition",

author = "Walter Menteth and Peter Caplehorn",

year = "2011",

month = oct,

day = "21",

language = "English",

publisher = "RIBA",

address = "United Kingdom",

type = "WorkingPaper",

institution = "RIBA",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - RIBA Submission PAS 91

T2 - response paper to the review of PAS 91

AU - Menteth, Walter

AU - Caplehorn, Peter

PY - 2011/10/21

Y1 - 2011/10/21

N2 - The RIBA welcomes the early review of PAS 91,the high aspirations that were set at the launch and within the document have not be achieved in practice. The desired alignment, universal use and subsequent reduction in needless bureaucracy, has seen little change since its introduction. Indeed from many perspectives these have all got worse since PAS 91’s introduction.In this submission we cover - The current document. Use of the document and the current procurement landscape. The overall packaging of the PAS and how it fits with the procurement world.

AB - The RIBA welcomes the early review of PAS 91,the high aspirations that were set at the launch and within the document have not be achieved in practice. The desired alignment, universal use and subsequent reduction in needless bureaucracy, has seen little change since its introduction. Indeed from many perspectives these have all got worse since PAS 91’s introduction.In this submission we cover - The current document. Use of the document and the current procurement landscape. The overall packaging of the PAS and how it fits with the procurement world.

KW - PAS 91

KW - RIBA

KW - qualification questionnaire

KW - procurement

KW - competition

M3 - Working paper

BT - RIBA Submission PAS 91

PB - RIBA

CY - London

ER -

RIBA Submission PAS 91: response paper to the review of PAS 91

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

Activities

Prizes

Cite this