Abstract
This study examines the likelihood of cheating when consumers are offered with the option of using postponed payment plans after purchasing hedonic goods. It addresses how the nature of the good combined with payment timing affects its perceived psychological ownership, which in turn influences consumers’ cheating behavior. Three experimental studies indicate that when consumers mentally represent a hedonic (vs. utilitarian) good, they are more likely to cheat. This effect is greater with a postponed payment than with an immediate one. Findings also show that perceived psychological ownership is lower for hedonic goods and this explains different levels of cheating behavior. The paper offers managerial guidance on how to increase perceived psychological ownership for hedonic goods, with the goal of reducing cheating behavior.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Psychology and Marketing |
Early online date | 22 Aug 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Early online - 22 Aug 2019 |
Keywords
- consumer cheating behavior
- hedonic good
- postponed payments
- psychological ownership
- utilitarian good
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting consumers’ cheating behavior. The role of mental representation of goods and psychological ownership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Dataset for 'Predicting consumers’ cheating behavior. The role of mental representation of goods and psychological ownership'.
Viglia, G. (Creator), Tassiello, V. (Creator), Gordon-Wilson, S. (Creator) & Grazzini , L. (Creator), University of Portsmouth, 23 Oct 2019
DOI: 10.17029/3762c4bf-3176-4906-b6a6-ec17979e012a
Dataset
File