TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and optimization of geotechnical soil maps using various geostatistical and spatial interpolation techniques
T2 - a comprehensive study
AU - Ijaz, Zain
AU - Zhao, Cheng
AU - Ijaz, Nauman
AU - Rehman, Zia ur
AU - Ijaz, Aashan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/6/1
Y1 - 2023/6/1
N2 - The substantial spatial variability of subsoil information in small grids poses a significant challenge for geological and geotechnical experts. In this regard, comprehensive geotechnical soil maps (GSMs) can address this challenge by employing smart interpolation techniques. However, the existing literature lacks a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of different interpolation techniques in handling the spatial variability of geotechnical data, emphasizing the need for further research. Therefore, this study evaluates the performance of different geostatistical and spatial analyst interpolation techniques using extensive geotechnical data from the Lahore region. Statistical evaluation using key performance indicators (KPIs) manifested that inverse distance weighting (IDW) under spatial analyst performs superiorly. GSMs were further developed at multiple depths based on standard penetration test (SPT-N), shear wave velocity (Vs), soil type, plasticity index (P.I), soil activity (A), and chemical contents. Besides, regression correlations were established for the SPT-N, Vs, P.I, and A values for prompt pre-estimation and pre-evaluation of the geotechnical properties. Results reveal that the study area is predominated with fine-grained soil at shallow depth (i.e., 3.0 m) with SPT-N, Vs, P.I, and A values ranging between 1 and > 30, 0 and > 272 (m/s), 0 and > 30, and 0 and > 1.25, respectively, whereas at higher depths, coarse-grained soil is dominant. The soil chemical content at 1.5 m below the existing ground level falls within permissible limits. Furthermore, GSM validation using KPIs presents a good fit of predicted values with real-scale data. The study findings provide comprehensive GSMs using an optimized interpolation model, enhancing economic and infrastructure stability by providing valuable information during the planning and designing stages.
AB - The substantial spatial variability of subsoil information in small grids poses a significant challenge for geological and geotechnical experts. In this regard, comprehensive geotechnical soil maps (GSMs) can address this challenge by employing smart interpolation techniques. However, the existing literature lacks a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of different interpolation techniques in handling the spatial variability of geotechnical data, emphasizing the need for further research. Therefore, this study evaluates the performance of different geostatistical and spatial analyst interpolation techniques using extensive geotechnical data from the Lahore region. Statistical evaluation using key performance indicators (KPIs) manifested that inverse distance weighting (IDW) under spatial analyst performs superiorly. GSMs were further developed at multiple depths based on standard penetration test (SPT-N), shear wave velocity (Vs), soil type, plasticity index (P.I), soil activity (A), and chemical contents. Besides, regression correlations were established for the SPT-N, Vs, P.I, and A values for prompt pre-estimation and pre-evaluation of the geotechnical properties. Results reveal that the study area is predominated with fine-grained soil at shallow depth (i.e., 3.0 m) with SPT-N, Vs, P.I, and A values ranging between 1 and > 30, 0 and > 272 (m/s), 0 and > 30, and 0 and > 1.25, respectively, whereas at higher depths, coarse-grained soil is dominant. The soil chemical content at 1.5 m below the existing ground level falls within permissible limits. Furthermore, GSM validation using KPIs presents a good fit of predicted values with real-scale data. The study findings provide comprehensive GSMs using an optimized interpolation model, enhancing economic and infrastructure stability by providing valuable information during the planning and designing stages.
KW - Geotechnical soil maps
KW - Key performance indicators
KW - Site characterization
KW - Soil properties
KW - Spatial interpolation
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160005290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10064-023-03244-x
DO - 10.1007/s10064-023-03244-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85160005290
SN - 1435-9529
VL - 82
JO - Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
JF - Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
IS - 6
M1 - 215
ER -