TY - JOUR
T1 - Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results
T2 - Simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps. II. cosmological results
AU - DES Collaboration
AU - Gatti, M.
AU - Campailla, G.
AU - Jeffrey, N.
AU - Whiteway, L.
AU - Porredon, A.
AU - Prat, J.
AU - Williamson, J.
AU - Raveri, M.
AU - Jain, B.
AU - Ajani, V.
AU - Giannini, G.
AU - Yamamoto, M.
AU - Zhou, C.
AU - Blazek, J.
AU - Anbajagane, D.
AU - Samuroff, S.
AU - Kacprzak, T.
AU - Alarcon, A.
AU - Amon, A.
AU - Bechtol, K.
AU - Becker, M.
AU - Bernstein, G.
AU - Campos, A.
AU - Chang, C.
AU - Chen, R.
AU - Choi, A.
AU - Davis, C.
AU - Derose, J.
AU - Diehl, H. T.
AU - Dodelson, S.
AU - Doux, C.
AU - Eckert, K.
AU - Elvin-Poole, J.
AU - Everett, S.
AU - Ferte, A.
AU - Gruen, D.
AU - Gruendl, R.
AU - Harrison, I.
AU - Hartley, W. G.
AU - Herner, K.
AU - Huff, E. M.
AU - Jarvis, M.
AU - Kuropatkin, N.
AU - Leget, P. F.
AU - MacCrann, N.
AU - McCullough, J.
AU - Myles, J.
AU - Andrade-Oliveira, F.
AU - Bacon, D.
AU - Gaztanaga, E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Physical Society.
PY - 2025/3/3
Y1 - 2025/3/3
N2 - We present a simulation-based cosmological analysis using a combination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian statistics of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps from the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey. We implement the following: (1) second and third moments; (2) wavelet phase harmonics; (3) the scattering transform. Our analysis is fully based on simulations, spans a space of seven w Cold Dark Matter (wCDM) cosmological parameters, and forward models the most relevant sources of systematics inherent in the data: masks, noise variations, clustering of the sources, intrinsic alignments, and shear and redshift calibration. We implement a neural network compression of the summary statistics, and we estimate the parameter posteriors using a simulation-based inference approach. Including and combining different non-Gaussian statistics is a powerful tool that strongly improves constraints over Gaussian statistics (in our case, the second moments); in particular, the figure of merit (S8,ωm) is improved by 70% (ΛCDM) and 90% (wCDM). When all the summary statistics are combined, we achieve a 2% constraint on the amplitude of fluctuations parameter S8σ8(ωm/0.3)0.5, obtaining S8=0.794±0.017 (ΛCDM) and S8=0.817±0.021 (wCDM), and a ∼10% constraint on ωm, obtaining ωm=0.259±0.025 (ΛCDM) and ωm=0.273±0.029 (wCDM). In the context of the wCDM scenario, these statistics also strengthen the constraints on the parameter w, obtaining w<-0.72. The constraints from different statistics are shown to be internally consistent (with a p-value>0.1 for all combinations of statistics examined). We compare our results to other weak lensing results from the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey data, finding good consistency; we also compare with results from external datasets, such as planck constraints from the cosmic microwave background, finding statistical agreement, with discrepancies no greater than <2.2σ.
AB - We present a simulation-based cosmological analysis using a combination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian statistics of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps from the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey. We implement the following: (1) second and third moments; (2) wavelet phase harmonics; (3) the scattering transform. Our analysis is fully based on simulations, spans a space of seven w Cold Dark Matter (wCDM) cosmological parameters, and forward models the most relevant sources of systematics inherent in the data: masks, noise variations, clustering of the sources, intrinsic alignments, and shear and redshift calibration. We implement a neural network compression of the summary statistics, and we estimate the parameter posteriors using a simulation-based inference approach. Including and combining different non-Gaussian statistics is a powerful tool that strongly improves constraints over Gaussian statistics (in our case, the second moments); in particular, the figure of merit (S8,ωm) is improved by 70% (ΛCDM) and 90% (wCDM). When all the summary statistics are combined, we achieve a 2% constraint on the amplitude of fluctuations parameter S8σ8(ωm/0.3)0.5, obtaining S8=0.794±0.017 (ΛCDM) and S8=0.817±0.021 (wCDM), and a ∼10% constraint on ωm, obtaining ωm=0.259±0.025 (ΛCDM) and ωm=0.273±0.029 (wCDM). In the context of the wCDM scenario, these statistics also strengthen the constraints on the parameter w, obtaining w<-0.72. The constraints from different statistics are shown to be internally consistent (with a p-value>0.1 for all combinations of statistics examined). We compare our results to other weak lensing results from the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey data, finding good consistency; we also compare with results from external datasets, such as planck constraints from the cosmic microwave background, finding statistical agreement, with discrepancies no greater than <2.2σ.
KW - UKRI
KW - STFC
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001872459&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063504
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063504
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001872459
SN - 2470-0010
VL - 111
JO - Physical Review D
JF - Physical Review D
IS - 6
M1 - 063504
ER -